Abortion has been a divisive issue for many years. Lot of opinions are there about abortions, either for or against for a long time. This is about taking of human life so it should be taken very serious. There are some points which I like to present about this.
The first thing which comes to my mind is that, No one has the right to take a life. According to medical science there is no life as there is no baby but an embryo but there is the potential to become a human and therefore it has got life. They just don’t make any difference between an embryo and a baby and they can’t accept it as it will end up killing a human life no matter what. Doesn’t the unborn child have rights?
In many countries killing a pregnant wife, will be charged by two murders. But women can have abortion and walk out of the clinic with any problem in many places. Isn’t it a crime, yes of course! I am not blaming all women who get into it. Some women are pushed into that situation either physclogically or through force.
Another issue is that because of this abortion there is a huge problem of low birthrate. Many families around the world stick two children mostly one child due to financial status.
Below is a survey conducted by by the polling organizations of Peter Hart and Neil Newhouse. Sept. 6-8, 2008.
“Which comes closest to your view on abortion: abortion should always be legal; should be legal most of the time; should be made illegal except in cases of rape, incest and to save the mother’s life; or abortion should be made illegal without any exceptions?”
Always Legal : 25%
Legal Most of the Time : 24%
Illegal With a Few Exceptions : 37%
Illegal Without Exceptions : 10%
Unsure : 4%
In most cases such as rape, unprotected sex, adoption comes to the mind. Instead of abortion they can give the baby to the needy. There are many families that are not blessed of a child and they can get a opportunity to take care of one. The love and happiness of those families will be completely lost if a woman makes the decision to have an abortion. All discarded children in the world be worthy of to be raised in home where they will get love, something that their organic parents can’t provide.
Getting an abortion for any reason would be really worse. It is a way for people to escape from their responsibilities. What do u say…???
Is India yesterday’s news? Will China, Russia, Vietnam and Brazil become the future of information technology offshore outsourcing? – By Marc Hebert | Courtesy – News.com
Some are making that argument, and there is an argument to be made. After all, the cost advantage of doing business in India has come under pressure as salaries for qualified Indian IT professionals reach record heights. Average Indian salaries in the field rose 12 percent last year, and they are expected to rise by about 15 percent across the industry again this year.
And as Indian salaries climb, many speculate that this presents opportunities for other offshoring hot spots, such as China, Eastern Europe–and even upstarts like Vietnam and Brazil. Some even speculate that rising salaries in India will erode the cost advantage over U.S. IT workers, ultimately returning offshore jobs to American soil. But that’s only one side of the story. To paraphrase Mark Twain, the reported death of Indian outsourcing is greatly exaggerated.
The counterargument rests on two pillars: productivity and scale. Salaries may increase, but there are offsetting factors such as experience, infrastructure, high productivity levels and economies ofSome people even speculate that rising salaries in India will erode the cost advantage over U.S. IT workers, ultimately returning offshore jobs to American soil.
scale to consider. Let me put it another way: The cost of doing information technology in India is falling, as the range and complexity of projects that can be offshored to India is increasing.How can that be? If you subtract the salary advantage, what makes India different than China, Russia and the myriad other countries chomping at the bit for IT work?
One reason is that India has a multiyear experience advantage over other nations. First-generation IT offshore providers cut their teeth on mainframe legacy code maintenance–the gritty work that few IT professionals in the United States care to do anymore. Now Indian IT companies are hitting the sweet spot of the enterprise application package market, offloading many of the high-volume, routine tasks that chief information officers struggle to maintain with high-cost U.S. resources. Countries like China and Russia simply don’t have the experience to handle these tasks, and it will take years for them to come anywhere close.
Better backbone
Another reason is that India has vastly improved its IT infrastructure. A few years ago, large-scale projects required mirrored offshore hardware/software environments that were expensive to set up and a nightmare to keep in sync. That’s no longer the case–distributed system development is now the de facto standard in many IT shops. India’s IT infrastructure improvements enable Indian businesses to match salary increases with productivity improvements.
What’s more, India has achieved global leadership in adopting continuous quality improvements that guarantee mature business processes and ongoing productivity improvement. By creating real software factories, Indian companies leverage the power of doing it right the first time. The leading software quality methodology in the world today is the Software Engineering Institute’s Capability Maturity Model, or CMM. It is no accident that two-thirds of the world’s CMM Level 5 organizations are based in India. Other countries will get there, but it’s going to take time.
In addition, many India-based companies have discovered the leverage in India’s university system to achieve increased efficiency. While it’s unrealisticCountries like China and Russia simply don’t have the experience to handle these tasks, and it will take years for them to come anywhere close.
to expect “freshers” to be highly productive the day they receive their sheepskins, Indian businesses with strong training programs quickly supplement their new college graduates’ strong theoretical IT foundations with the practical skills needed on their projects. College graduate salaries start at less than $5,000 per year, which is about half the salary or less of a seasoned Indian software developer.Finally, India is rapidly creating huge economies of scale in IT offshoring, which further offset the inflationary pressures of salary increases. To counter wage increases, many offshore outsourcers are implementing large team sizes and long-term projects to help maintain utilization levels at above 75 percent. With larger teams comes the ability to include new college graduates in the mix, enabling them to train on the job.
While Indian IT salaries are undeniably on the rise, don’t think that this will derail the offshore-to-India IT locomotive. Offshore service providers continue to find ways to provide their customers with increased productivity and scale, thus ensuring that India will not easily cede its current dominant share of the global IT offshoring market. And with the Indian government’s focus on dramatically upping the supply of technical graduates over time, it ensures that India keeps moving up that steep productivity curve. That’s the power of productivity–and India has figured it out.
P.N. Oak, President of The Institute for Rewriting Indian History, has repeatedly asserted that the Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple of the god Shiva, usurped and remodeled by Shah Jahan. The temple’s name, he says, was originally “Tejo Mahalaya”; this was corrupted over time to “Taj Mahal”. Oak also claims that the tombs of Humayun, Akbar and Itmiad-u-Dallah — as well as the Vatican in Rome, the Kaaba in Mecca, Stonehenge and “all historic buildings” in India — were also Hindu temples or palaces.
The Taj is only a typical illustration of how all historic buildings and townships from Kashmir to Cape Comorin though of Hindu origin have been ascribed to this or that Muslim ruler or courtier.He further says that if Taj Mahal was not a Shiva temple, that it might then have been the palace of a Rajput king. In any case, the Taj Mahal was Hindu in origin, stolen by Shah Jahan and adapted as a tomb — although Oak also claims that Mumtaz is not buried there.
Oak further states that the numerous eyewitness accounts of Taj Mahal construction, and Shah Jahan’s construction orders and voluminous financial records, are elaborate frauds meant to hide its Hindu origin.His many provocative assertions have gained a lot of popular interest and made Oak a well-known media figure.He has sued to break open the cenotaphs, and to tear down brick walls in the lower plinth: In these “fake tombs” and “sealed apartments”, Oak says Shivalingams or other temple items were hidden by Shah Jahan.
According to Oak, the Indian government’s refusal to allow him unfettered access amounts to a conspiracy against Hinduism.Oak’s assertions are not accepted by legitimate scholars. But these stories are widely believed and publicized by some contemporary Hindutva activists.
In 2000 India’s Supreme Court dismissed Oak’s petition to declare that a Hindu king built the Taj Mahal and reprimanded him for bringing the action. In 2005 a similar petition was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. This case was brought by Amar Nath Mishra, a social worker and preacher who claims that the Taj Mahal was built by the Hindu King Parmar Dev in 1196.
For detailed proof of this breath taking discovery, you may read the well known historian Shri. P. N. Oak’s celebrated book titled ” Tajmahal : The True Story”. But let us place before you, for the time being an exhaustive summary of the massive evidence ranging over hundred points: Tajmahal a hindu monument evidence.doc